Home Blog Page 24

Watermark retirement communities earn LGBT care-provider designation – Rochester Business Journal

The nine Watermark Legacy Retirement Communities in the Rochester area have received SAGECare Platinum certification as providers of specialized care for LGBT seniors. The facilities include Clover Blossom, Cranberry Landing, Erie Station, Fairways, Grand’Vie, Maiden Park, Park Crescent, Parklands and Willow Pond. SAGE, a nonprofit based in New York City, provides public policy support and personal resources focused …

Lawmakers call to end restrictions on gay men donating blood – Spectrum News NY1

Jude Graham has always wanted to give blood.

“It’s personal,” Graham told Spectrum News’ Samantha-Jo Roth, noting that his desire to donate dates back to high school and his service in the military — and when his younger cousin needed a bone marrow transplant a few years ago.

“I was ineligible because of the FDA’s ban on men who have sex with men donating blood and/or blood products,” the 26-year-old Navy veteran said.

“Knowing that I wasn’t able to donate made me feel almost useless,” Graham said, adding: “It definitely made me feel like I wasn’t contributing in a meaningful way to something that’s super easy to do.”

In 1983, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) barred blood donations from all men who have had sex with men (MSM) after 1977 “to reduce the transmission of HIV by blood and blood products.”

The policy was revised in 2015 to a 12-month deferral period — meaning that in order to donate blood, MSMs needed to abide by a year-long abstinence span — and revised again in April 2020 to three months, citing the “urgent need for blood” at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

What the FDA’s guidance doesn’t take into account is men who are practicing safe sexual practices, or those who are in monogamous relationships, advocates say. 

“For example, a man who has had protected oral sex with another man once in the 3 months currently (is) barred from donating blood,” the Human Rights Campaign says. “Yet a woman who has had unprotected sex with multiple partners over the same time frame with no knowledge of their personal histories remains in the donor pool.”

Some lawmakers are calling for the FDA to do away with these restrictions completely.

“The sooner this happens, the better,” Florida Rep. Val Demings told Spectrum News. “The ability to donate blood saves lives. It is one of the most precious life-saving gifts.”

The Democratic lawmaker, who is challenging Republican incumbent Marco Rubio for a seat in the Senate next year, also has a personal connection to this fight. Five years ago, Demings’ community was rocked by the Pulse Nightclub shooting, which saw 49 people killed, many of whom were Latino and LGBTQ+.

“There’s so many things I remember from that tragic day,” Demings said. “One of them were individuals who wanted to donate blood but, because of antiquated laws and procedures, they were not able to.”

After the Pulse shooting, more than 100 members of the House and nearly two dozen senators wrote separate letters to the commissioner of the FDA urging the agency to change its policy.

In April 2020, more than 500 medical professionals signed an open letter released by GLAAD, the world’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) media advocacy organization, calling on the FDA to eliminate the ban. 

The same month, the American Medical Association (AMA) released a statement applauding the FDA for changing the deferral period from 12 months to three, but urged the FDA to “take future steps to remove the categorical restrictions for blood donations by MSM so they are instead based on a person’s individual risk, consistent with the latest scientific evidence, to ensure blood donation criteria is equitably applied across all people.”

Last year, the FDA launched a first-of-its-kind study known as Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility, or ADVANCE, which could be the first step toward revising restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men. The study is funded by the FDA and is being conducted by the nation’s largest blood centers: Vitalant, OneBlood and the American Red Cross.

Graham is one such participant. He told Spectrum News that “it was like going to the doctor’s office.”

“There was a questionnaire. They took a small sample of blood, a lot less than I thought they were going to,” he said.

The study aims to enroll 2,000 men at community health centers in Los Angeles; San Francisco; Memphis, Tennessee; Miami, Orlando, Florida; Atlanta; Baton Rouge, Louisiana; and Washington, D.C. who meet the criteria — namely, men from the ages of 18-39 who live in those communities and who have had sex with at least one other man in the three months before joining the study.

The study aims to provide data to the FDA by the end of the year.

Earlier this month, ahead of the Pulse anniversary, New York Rep. Carolyn Maloney, along with Demings and a number of other House Democrats, sent a letter to acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock supporting the ADVANCE study.

“We applaud the FDA’s decision to launch a pilot study that will utilize an individual blood donation questionnaire to assess risk factors that could indicate possible infection with a transfusion transmissible infection, including HIV,” the lawmakers wrote. 

“We appreciate that the FDA has been willing to engage in discussions specific to the MSM deferral policy and revise guidance following Pulse, which included modifying the blanket ban to 12-months and again to 3-months deferral periods,” they acknowledged. “These are steps in the right direction, but ultimately reductions in the ban should not be tied specifically to sexual orientation or disaster-based supply issues.

“An individual’s personal risk profile, regardless of sexual orientation and based on scientific and technological progress, should guide the policy,” they concluded.

According to the American Red Cross, the United States is currently confronting a severe blood shortage; the group is urging eligible Americans to donate blood.

“The Red Cross is currently experiencing a severe blood shortage,” Chris Hrouda, president of Red Cross Biomedical Services, said in a statement last week. “Our teams are working around the clock to meet the extraordinary blood needs of hospitals and patients – distributing about 75,000 more blood products than expected over the past three months to meet demand – but we can’t do it without donors.

“Every two seconds, someone in the U.S. needs blood,” Hrouda added.

A 2014 analysis from UCLA School of Law’s Williams Institute estimated that lifting restrictions on men who have sex with men could increase the total annual blood supply by 2-4%.

Last week, the United Kingdom lifted similar restrictions, allowing people of any gender or sexual orientation who have been in a monogamous relationship for at least three months to donate blood, the National Health Service announced.

Graham has similar hopes for the ADVANCE study in the United States.

“I hope the study proves to the FDA that they can repeal their discriminatory policy,” Graham said, urging more people to participate in the study. 

“If you are a gay or bi man in one of the participating cities, please consider signing up because we have to be the change we want to see,” he added.

8 Recent Books Featuring LGBTQ Characters – AARP

Memorial by Bryan Washington

A 2020 debut novel from the up-and-coming Washington (his short story collection, Lot, won the 2020 Lambda Literary Award for gay fiction), Memorial introduces us to Benson, a Black day care teacher, and Mike, a Japanese-American chef who live together in Houston. The couple’s domestic life is upended when Mike leaves for Japan to spend time with his dying father in Osaka — just as his mother, Mitsuko, arrives in Houston for a visit and becomes an unlikely roommate with Benson. Told alternately from Mike and Benson’s perspectives as each man undergoes a personal reckoning during their time apart, the novel takes up perennial themes — love, family and the meaning of home — with keen insight into matters of race and identity.

People Are Asking A Major Question About Pixar’s Luca – Looper

0

On Twitter, fans are definitely reading gayness in the main characters — and they’re loving the feels the movie gives them as a result. “Luca is a gay Disney movie. Alberto is a homosexual and I love him,” said @lgbtommysnail. “The gay allegory in Pixar’s Luca was so poignant for my partner and I. What a great film!,” posted @HMMLynnWrites. “#Luca is one of the most beautiful queer-coded films i’ve ever seen. it perfectly captures the feeling of the best friend you’re kinda in love with as a young gay kid, the confusion, the fear of being different & hiding.. despite it using sea monster metaphors to do it. 1000/10!!,” posted @blysmanors.

Not everyone was happy, of course, because they felt “Luca” was a gay film designed to be acceptable to the movie-going public. “the mixed messaging in Luca astonishing. It’s exactly like saying ITS OKAY TO BE and then writing the word gay in lowercase cursive on a piece of paper and folding that paper and sticking it in someone’s pocket,” noted @absrdst

And @bingheluvr69 pointed out, “dk where I thought I heard something about Luca being gay so I got my expectations up also cus it’s pride month I actually thought But it was still a cute movie even if DisPixar are cowards.”

Others denied this read of the film, with one Twitter user asserting that Italian culture allows platonic friendships that look like Luca and Alberto’s relationship. Some posters wondered why this had to be seen as a gay relationship versus a close boyhood friendship, although others noted that gay relationships are often sexualized on-screen but can be as innocent as youthful heterosexual relationships as well. And others felt that by viewing “Luca” through a queer-coded lens, the movie ceases being relatable to others. @CYBrady said, “What a way to reduce a timeless story into a single narrative. That’s a GREAT way to kill it. It’s NOT JUST about being the Gay. It’s about BEING DIFFERENT.”

Anti-LGBT Law: UEFA Declines Munich’s ‘Rainbow’ Request For Germany-Hungary, Euro 2020 Game – Outlook India

UEFA has declined the Munich city council’s application to have its stadium illuminated in rainbow colors for Germany’s final European Championship group game against Hungary on Wednesday. (More Football News)

The governing body said in a statement Tuesday that it understands the intention behind the proposal but “must decline this request” because of its political context — “a message aiming at a decision taken by the Hungarian national parliament.”

Munich Mayor Dieter Reiter’s application on behalf of the council made clear it wanted to protest a law passed by Hungarian lawmakers last week that prohibits sharing with minors any content portraying homosexuality or sex reassignment. The law was denounced as anti-LGBT discrimination by human rights groups.

Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó blasted the German plan on Monday.

“In Hungary we have passed a law to protect Hungarian children, and now in Western Europe they are griping about it,” Szijjártó said in Luxembourg.

“They want to express this by including politics in a sporting event, which has nothing to do with the passing of national laws.”

UEFA said it believes “that discrimination can only be fought in close collaboration with others” and it proposed that Munich illuminates the stadium with the rainbow colors on June 28 for Christopher Street Day or between July 3-9 for the Christopher Street Day week in the city.

The body said these dates “align better with existing events.”

German soccer federation spokesman Jens Grittner had already suggested Monday that it might also be an option to display the colors in the days after Hungary’s visit. Munich will host a quarterfinal match at Euro 2020 on July 2.

But the delayed action undermines the Munich’s city’s planned protest against what it calls “the homophobic and transphobic legislation of the Hungarian government.”

Hungary’s National Assembly approved the bill against sharing LGBT content with minors in a 157-1 vote last week, when one independent lawmaker voted against it and all other opposition parties boycotted the voting session in protest.

“This legislation represents a new mark in the invisibility and disenfranchisement of lesbians, gays, bisexual, transgender and intersex people (LGBTI) and adds to the systematic restriction of the rule of law and fundamental freedoms that have been practiced for years in Hungary,” the Munich council said in its application, which had cross-party support.

UEFA said it understood the council’s intention to send a message to promote diversity and inclusion but stressed that it was “a politically and religiously neutral organization.”

On Sunday, UEFA gave the go-ahead for Germany goalkeeper Manuel Neuer to continue wearing a captain’s armband with the rainbow colors at the tournament.

“What does the rainbow stand for?” German government spokesman Steffen Seibert asked on Monday.

“It stands for how we want to live: With respect for each other, without the discrimination that has long excluded minorities. And surely the vast majority of people can relate to that.”


For in-depth, objective and more importantly balanced journalism, Click here to subscribe to Outlook Magazine


Travis Shumake Strives to Become First Openly Gay NHRA Funny Car Driver – Autoweek

  • Travis Shumake is the son of former NHRA Funny Car driver Tripp Shumake, who was killed in a motorcycle accident in 1999.
  • At 36, Travis Shumake hopes to become the first openly gay driver in the NHRA Funny Car class.
  • Shumake plans to hit the racetrack by season’s end, commemorating his father’s last NHRA Funny Car victory 40 years ago at the Finals.

    Travis Shumake was just 15 when his father, popular NHRA Funny Car driver Tripp Shumake, was killed in November 1999, his motorcycle struck by a hit-and-run driver traveling on the wrong side of the road near their home at Chandler, Ariz.

    Father and son had bonded through karting and spending seemingly endless days at the dragstrip. And Travis Shumake said he thought his connection to drag racing had been severed.

    Now, at age 36 and well-established as a development officer for a New York City-based global non-profit organization, Travis Shumake is preparing to plunge into the 330-mph Funny Car world he has observed from the fringes—tackling perhaps the last frontier in the already-diversity-rich National Hot Rod Association.

    Shumake plans to hit the racetrack by season’s end, commemorating his father’s last NHRA Funny Car victory 40 years ago at the Finals—and becoming the Camping World Drag Racing Series’ first openly gay driver.

    On June 15, Shumake earned his Nostalgia Funny Car license at the Frank Hawley Drag Racing School Florida. He still needs to secure his Nitro Funny Car license.

    tipp shewmake, nhra funny car

    Chadwick Fowler

    What distinguishes him played a large part in what held him back for so many years but today motivates him to move forward with his dream.

    “I’ve been planning this for a very long time. I was waiting to pull the trigger,” Shumake said. “As everyone would say, going through COVID helped me kind of realign my priorities, just allowed me to take this chance. For me, it’s always been Funny Car. That’s where I belong. I want this for my dad, and I want this for our sport. And I’m only getting older, so let’s try it.

    “All the interactions I’m having with people within the sport are very positive. And I have to believe that it’s not just because people knew my dad. One thing I’ve always heard from most people about my dad is that he and my mom were just the nicest people on the circuit, that my dad was always just so nice. And I just want to continue that, as well. That jovial spirit in the pits would be something I really want to continue on and (have others say) ‘You remind me of Tripp’ – and not just my big nose, but the way I act. But they’re not giving me a mulligan for being gay because my dad was great or whatever. I’m sure there will be some hiccups along the way and people who are challenged by my sexuality. And I certainly don’t want to impose anything upon them,” he said.

    “But I also do think it’s a really good thing for the sport. It brings a new conversation to the table and more eyes on the sport when the sport certainly could use some additional eyes,” Shumake said. He’s hoping to leverage his situation “to elevate the sport” in terms of ratings, attendance, the FOX-TV package, new fans, and additional corporate involvement.

    He said “the month of July and even the last week of June are going to be pedal to the metal with my goal of trying to be licensed (in a Nitro Funny Car) by the U.S. Nationals (Labor Day weekend) and if not, testing the Tuesday after the race. I’d love to be in a seat by the Finals. My dad won the race 40 years ago, and that would be kind of a cool experience to compete in my first start at the race that he won four decades ago. So those are kind of my next steps, but ideally, these next three to four weeks are going to be pretty aggressive.” He plans influential meetings this week “and then it’s really super-duper go-time.”

    “It brings a new conversation to the table and more eyes on the sport …”

    Securing sponsorship always has been a challenge—for the experienced racer or newcomer to the sport, for the garden-variety racer or one with a marketing-niche edge, pre- or post-pandemic. But Shumake said, “I’m always shaking hands and asking for large checks” in his job. So he’s less fearful than most about the funding aspect of starting a racing career.

    If he had to say his sponsorship-procurement chances will be harder or easier, he said, “I definitely think it’s the latter. None of this is going to be easy, so I’m certainly not trying to paint a rosy picture. But I do think that the sponsors that would engage with me are going to have a strong stance on this topic.

    “And I do think it’s going to open additional doors for me but not just for me – for the sport. And that’s kind of the conversations I’m having with the NHRA,” Shumake said. “I’m not just going to take (another racer’s) sponsorship. Ideally, I’m going to be bringing in new money to the sport and new eyes that are interested in being a part of this first test of the waters in this area. Maybe it’ll hinder me within the sport, with existing sponsors, but as far as getting new dollars in, I think it’s going to be a great tool.

    “Corporate support of the LGBTQ+ community should be represented on the racetrack, as well,” he said. “Bringing new fans and sponsors to the fastest growing motorsport in the world is a win-win for everyone involved. Someone will be the first. It’s only a matter of time.”

    Curiously, he has gotten opposite advice from mentors about whether to trade on the fact he’s gay. Ultimately, he knows performance on the track is what counts. “That’s a lot of pressure.” One told him, essentially, “You got to be good, too, Travis, if you get this to happen. You don’t want to be the guy who was gay and terrible.”

    He understands that. Shumake said, “So I’m back and forth on playing up the gay card, but I think it’s a good business model.” Someone told him he doesn’t need to emphasize it because “it’s 2021.” But he played Devil’s advocate: “Yeah, but I kind of do. I don’t know that you would be talking to me right now (otherwise). Hopefully after one or two races, it’s a non-starter. And I think that will be the case.”

    tipp shewmake, nhra funny car

    Chadwick Fowler

    The NHRA community skews conservative, but Shumake said, “I’m very confident about the percentage of the drag racing world that will accept me and that will encourage me . . . if and when I have those challenges, kind of hopefully bring people together. One of my bigger goals is to show people that this happened in drag racing and it’s the first sport to make it happen, at least in the modern era. I don’t want to just prove a point to the people in NHRA. I want an NHRA to be proving a point to other sports, like we have for decades.

    “I’ve always known this would be the challenging part, the assumed demographics of the sport. I’m sure that there are going to be hiccups, but just knowing that so far as I’m going through this more and more people are like, ‘This is great,’ you build you that confidence so that when I hit a negative crossroad or I’m met with resilience or someone says something to me in the starting line or in the pits, I’ll have that confidence. That’s kind of been built by that inner circle of folks who believe in me,” he said.

    Still, he said, “It is absolutely terrifying. I lose so much sleep. I lose a lot of sleep right now. My sister calls me to calm me down often. She (says), ‘I feel like you might be stressing.’ I’m like, ‘I’ve just put myself out there real far. I’m a little out over my skis, and I can’t fall. Now. I’ve just got to lean into this and make this happen.’ But it’s that internal stress and pressure by this sort of becoming a thing pretty quickly. I’m just trying to stay on top of it and not back down. Oh my God, it’s terrifying. Like, wow, what have I gotten myself into? Oh my gosh. There’s so much pressure I’m putting on myself because now this is out there. And you know, when you’ve asked Larry Dixon and Justin Ashley and Matt Hagan to be your brain trust, you can’t really let them down and change your mind.”

    Shumake said he and his father “never had that conversation.” But he said he has learned from a close friend of his dad that they “had several conversations in my teen years about the topic. And he was very much aware, but we had never had that conversation. So I know he knew that but not from my mouth.”

    Tripp Shumake didn’t live to see his son become a foster parent and an advocate for homeless gay teens through his work in Arizona with one•n•ten, a non-profit organization dedicated to helping LGBTQ youth ages 14-24. But the younger Shumake said, “I know my dad would be proud of me for breaking that barrier. Now is the time to show the world there is a place for gay competitors and fans in motorsports.

    “It’s Pride Month, and I’m sure there are plenty of drivers out there who feel restrained to pursue their passion for motorsports because these waters haven’t been tested,” he said.

    “There are current drivers, even in the sportsman ranks. I know a few. I affectionately call us the Gay Mafia. There’s about 10 people I know in the sport that are gay that haven’t taken the steps like I am taking, just because of that fear,” Shumake said. “I think there are beyond more people that would be interested in getting into the sport, those being more comfortable being themselves within the sport—not trying to out anyone by saying that.

    “There have been so many more gay people, but we don’t talk. I mean, they just don’t—no one talks about it. I think there’s a lot more, but there’s not a comfort level. I’m putting it out there, if anything, to make people more comfortable and kind of break down that wall for a second,” he said. “Maybe if, for some reason, someone is able to come out of the closet or enter the sport—gay, lesbian, transgender—because of my attempts at this, that would certainly be rewarding enough to me.

    “The sportsman drivers I’m referencing have husbands,” he said. “I’m like, how do people not know you’re gay? ‘Like, we just don’t talk about it’. I’m like, ‘Wait, what? So I’m going to get all the credit, but you’ve been out here forever?’ And they’re like, ‘Yeah, but do it, Bro, do it.’ I’m like, ‘OK, I’ll do it for you.’”

    Devon Rouse, 22, a dirt-track sprint-car veteran from West Burlington, Iowa, is a friend of Shumake, and they encourage one another as Rouse embarks on his NASCAR journey as the first openly gay Camping World Truck Series driver. Rouse tested in an ARCA Menards Series car and in a NASCAR truck entry, but his plans went on hold during the pandemic. Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis, who stepped up last year to sponsor the NHRA pro series, is sponsoring Rouse for the July 9 Truck Series event at Knoxville (Iowa) Raceway.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

    During Pride Month, Markey, Kaine and Baldwin Lead Resolution Apologizing For Government Discrimination Against LGBT Community – Ed Markey

    WASHINGTON,
    D.C. — U.S. Senator Tim Kaine, a member of the Senate Armed Services
    Committee (SASC) and Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC), and Senator
    Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) led the introduction of a Senate resolution that
    acknowledges and apologizes for the mistreatment of and discrimination against
    lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LBGT) individuals who have served our
    nation as civil servants or members of the Armed Forces and Foreign Service.
    The resolution also reaffirms the federal government’s commitment to treat all
    military service members, veterans, foreign service employees, federal civil
    service employees, and contractors with equal respect and fairness, regardless
    of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

    “Throughout
    our history, far too many people serving our nation have lived in fear of
    retribution or persecution because of their sexual orientation,” said
    Senator Kaine.
    “It’s time to acknowledge the harm caused to these
    Americans, their families, and our country by depriving them of the right to
    serve as federal civil servants, diplomats, or in the Armed Services. I’m proud
    to introduce this Senate resolution during Pride Month to reaffirm our nation’s
    commitment to treat everyone, including LGBT Americans, with equal respect and
    fairness. I will continue working toward advancing equality for all LGBT people
    in Virginia and across our nation.”

    “This
    Senate resolution takes a stand on the side of respect for LBGT Americans who
    have served our nation, and reaffirms our commitment to treat all public
    servants with fairness and equality, regardless of their sexual orientation or
    gender identity,” said Senator Baldwin. “As we celebrate Pride Month, I
    take great pride in being a part of this effort to move our county forward as
    we join together with a shared commitment to the idea that with each passing
    day, and each passing year, America should become more equal, not less.”

    Despite
    hundreds of thousands of LGBT service members having honorably served the
    United States in uniform, with many fighting and dying in wars around the
    globe, the federal government maintained decades-long policies explicitly
    barring these Americans from government and military service. For example, in
    1949, the Department of Defense decreed that “homosexual personnel,
    irrespective of sex, should not be permitted to serve in any branch of the
    Armed Forces in any capacity and prompt separation of known homosexuals from
    the Armed Forces is mandatory.” Historians have estimated that at least 100,000
    service members were forced out of the Armed Forces between World War II and
    2011 simply for being LGBT, while countless others were forced to hide their
    identities and live in fear while serving. In addition, more than 1,000 State
    Department employees were dismissed due to their alleged sexual orientation,
    and many more were prevented from joining due to discriminatory hiring
    practices. In 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower issued an executive
    order defining “perversion” as a national security threat and mandating that
    every civilian employee and contractor pass a security clearance, which known
    LGBT people would fail because of so-called “perversion.”

    Further,
    the Senate conducted hearings during the 1950s that defamed LGBT federal
    employees and heightened persecution of these patriotic public servants.

    The
    resolution is also co-sponsored by Senators Ed Markey (D-MA), Richard
    Blumenthal (D-CT), Mark R. Warner (D-VA), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Cory Booker (D-NJ),
    Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Bob Casey (D-PA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Jeanne
    Shaheen (D-NH), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Jacky Rosen
    (D-NV), Patty Murray (D-WA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Chris Coons (D-DE), and
    Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD).

    The
    full resolution can be viewed here.

    DURING PRIDE MONTH, KAINE AND BALDWIN LEAD RESOLUTION APOLOGIZING FOR GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST LGBT COMMUNITY – Ed Markey

    WASHINGTON,
    D.C. — U.S. Senator Tim Kaine, a member of the Senate Armed Services
    Committee (SASC) and Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC), and Senator
    Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) led the introduction of a Senate resolution that
    acknowledges and apologizes for the mistreatment of and discrimination against
    lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LBGT) individuals who have served our
    nation as civil servants or members of the Armed Forces and Foreign Service.
    The resolution also reaffirms the federal government’s commitment to treat all
    military service members, veterans, foreign service employees, federal civil
    service employees, and contractors with equal respect and fairness, regardless
    of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

    “Throughout
    our history, far too many people serving our nation have lived in fear of
    retribution or persecution because of their sexual orientation,” said
    Senator Kaine.
    “It’s time to acknowledge the harm caused to these
    Americans, their families, and our country by depriving them of the right to
    serve as federal civil servants, diplomats, or in the Armed Services. I’m proud
    to introduce this Senate resolution during Pride Month to reaffirm our nation’s
    commitment to treat everyone, including LGBT Americans, with equal respect and
    fairness. I will continue working toward advancing equality for all LGBT people
    in Virginia and across our nation.”

    “This
    Senate resolution takes a stand on the side of respect for LBGT Americans who
    have served our nation, and reaffirms our commitment to treat all public
    servants with fairness and equality, regardless of their sexual orientation or
    gender identity,” said Senator Baldwin. “As we celebrate Pride Month, I
    take great pride in being a part of this effort to move our county forward as
    we join together with a shared commitment to the idea that with each passing
    day, and each passing year, America should become more equal, not less.”

    Despite
    hundreds of thousands of LGBT service members having honorably served the
    United States in uniform, with many fighting and dying in wars around the
    globe, the federal government maintained decades-long policies explicitly
    barring these Americans from government and military service. For example, in
    1949, the Department of Defense decreed that “homosexual personnel,
    irrespective of sex, should not be permitted to serve in any branch of the
    Armed Forces in any capacity and prompt separation of known homosexuals from
    the Armed Forces is mandatory.” Historians have estimated that at least 100,000
    service members were forced out of the Armed Forces between World War II and
    2011 simply for being LGBT, while countless others were forced to hide their
    identities and live in fear while serving. In addition, more than 1,000 State
    Department employees were dismissed due to their alleged sexual orientation,
    and many more were prevented from joining due to discriminatory hiring
    practices. In 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower issued an executive
    order defining “perversion” as a national security threat and mandating that
    every civilian employee and contractor pass a security clearance, which known
    LGBT people would fail because of so-called “perversion.”

    Further,
    the Senate conducted hearings during the 1950s that defamed LGBT federal
    employees and heightened persecution of these patriotic public servants.

    The
    resolution is also co-sponsored by Senators Ed Markey (D-MA), Richard
    Blumenthal (D-CT), Mark R. Warner (D-VA), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Cory Booker (D-NJ),
    Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Bob Casey (D-PA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Jeanne
    Shaheen (D-NH), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Jacky Rosen
    (D-NV), Patty Murray (D-WA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Chris Coons (D-DE), and
    Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD).

    The
    full resolution can be viewed here.

    One in five young adult Mormons in the US are gay, lesbian or bisexual – Religion News Service

    With data analysis by Benjamin Knoll

    More than a fifth of Generation Z Mormons do not self-identify as heterosexual, according to a major national study. One in ten are bisexual.

    The Nationscape dataset, which canvassed more than 318,000 Americans on a rolling basis in 2019 and 2020, had 3,881 self-identified members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the survey. This makes it one of the largest studies of Mormons ever fielded in the United States.

    One of the most valuable aspects of the data is what it can tell us about the basic demographics of the Mormon population, including gender, race, geography and sexual orientation.

    Not surprisingly, there is more sexual diversity among younger Latter-day Saints than older ones. As shown below, while 94% of Boomers said they were heterosexual, just 77% of Generation Z did. (This analysis borrows Pew’s cutoff dates for the generations, which uses 1997 as the first birth year of GenZ. Only adult GenZers over the age of 18 were eligible for the study.)

    So, 23% of GenZers who identify as LDS say they are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or other. And nearly as many (19%) of Millennials did as well. It’s notable that this finding is nearly double the 10% that Benjamin Knoll and I found among Millennials in the 2016 Next Mormons Survey (which broke down into 7% bisexual, 2% gay or lesbian, and 1% “other”).

    Let’s unpack the Nationscape study’s finding of 23% a bit more. Within GenZ, the major outliers compared to other generations of Mormons were the categories of bisexual and “other.”

      GenZ Mormons (n=523) Millennial Mormons (n=1362) GenX Mormons (n=973) Boomer/Silent Mormons (n=1023 combined)
    Heterosexual/straight 77% 81% 89% 93%
    Gay/lesbian 7% 8% 6% 2%
    Bisexual 10% 5% 2% 2%
    Prefer not to say 1% 4% 2% 2%
    Other 4% 2% 1% 0%

    We think three points are worth making here.

    First, generationally, sexual diversity is high among GenZ Mormons because it’s high among GenZ as a whole. In terms of sexual orientation, Nationscape’s GenZ Mormons look a lot like non-Mormons their same age:

      GenZ Mormons GenZ non-Mormons
    Heterosexual 77% 77%
    Gay/lesbian 8% 5%
    Bisexual 10% 12%
    Prefer not to say 1% 3%
    Other 4% 3%

    So GenZ Mormons, like their counterparts around the nation, are more likely to be queer. According to Pew’s recent study of GenZ, they seem more comfortable with gender fluidity and same-sex marriage than any other generation, though Millennials come close.

    GenZers are also more likely to feel fine admitting their sexual orientation on a survey. Fewer than 1% chose the “prefer not to say” option in the Nationscape study, compared to 2%–4% of the members of older generations who did not want to answer the question. The atmosphere today for admitting a non-heterosexual identity is far more hospitable than it was even a decade ago, and many GenZers don’t personally remember a time when they could be fired from a job for being LGB+.

    The second point is that GenZ Mormons currently show more sexual diversity than older generations of Latter-day Saints because, frankly, some of them are statistically likely to leave the Church but have not yet done so.

    The GenZ respondents in the Nationscape study were 18 to 22 at the time of the survey. According to our own research in The Next Mormons, the median age for leaving the Church is around 19. In other words, there is still some settling and sorting yet to happen here. We are by no means saying that all of these queer-identifying young adult Mormons are going to exit the Church, of course—only that statistically, more will likely do so than their heterosexual peers.

    It’s not surprising that it’s harder for queerfolk to stay. The Church has made a point for years of fighting same-sex marriage, condemning nontraditional families as “counterfeit,” and preventing Church members who are in a same-sex relationship from attending the temple, holding certain callings or exercising the priesthood. While there have been important steps toward compassion and understanding in the last few years, that damage still runs deep.

    So the percentage of queer GenZ Mormons will probably not be as high as 23% in future studies. That won’t be because these people will have magically become heterosexual as they get older. It will be because they will have ceased to be Mormon, and will drop out of the pool of respondents who currently identify as members of the Church. As well, some heterosexuals will likely continue to switch in to the religion through conversion, possibly enough to change the ratio going forward.

    Finally, one surprising aspect of the study is related to race and geography. Nationscape’s data suggests that among Mormons, some racial and ethnic minorities were more likely to also be sexual minorities.

    Among all Americans, heterosexuality was 87% for Hispanics and 90% for Blacks, but among Mormons it was 71% for Hispanics and 74% for Blacks. It’s a statistically significant difference because the sample size is big enough that this isn’t just a random sampling error. Still, it’s not clear why Black and Hispanic Mormons exhibit more sexual diversity than their non-LDS counterparts.

    Incidentally, the Nationscape study showed a double-digit difference between Mormons who lived in Utah (94% heterosexual) and those who did not (83% heterosexual). This echoes and widens a smaller four-point difference we found in the 2016 NMS regarding the sexual orientation of Mormons in Utah versus Mormons elsewhere.

    We speculate that this is the result of self-selection, in that red-state Utah may just be a more challenging place for sexual minorities to live, at least outside of Salt Lake City.

    Related content:

    A prominent Mormon therapist apologized for anti-LGBT activism. What’s the next step?

    Mormon leaders reverse LGBT policy, raising the question: What is revelation?

    If Luca and The Falcon And The Winter Soldier are gay to you, then they’re gay – Yahoo Lifestyle

    Anthony Mackie, cover your ears: Luca is gay. While it’s not made explicit, Pixar’s latest—the sun-soaked tale about the transformative friendship between two young sea monsters who disguise their true identity to explore life on land among humans—makes for a rich parable for the queer coming-of-age experience, and one that feels more genuine and more heartfelt than any of the Disney corporation’s meager attempts at “exclusively gay moments” in recent years.

    Though the concern Mackie voiced last week, about “the exploitation of homosexuality,” was a direct response to fans ’shipping a romance between his Sam Wilson and Sebastian Stan’s Bucky Barnes in the MCU, it’s hard not to read it as a critique of the broader culture: that LGBTQ+ audiences, in particular, misinterpret certain characters and stories to—in his words—“make themselves relevant and rational.” In that sense, it’s a funny coincidence Mackie’s statement was published the day prior to Luca’s release: Ever since its Call Me By Your Name-esque synopsis was first revealed, it was speculated (sometimes jokingly) that the movie would be gay, or at least a gay metaphor. And, now that it’s available to stream on Disney+, I’m not alone in picking up on a deeper connection within the blossoming friendship of Luca (Jacob Tremblay) and Alberto (Jack Dylan Grazer). So, are we just desperately grasping at straws here, trying to “rationalize” ourselves, by thinking, in some way, that Luca might be reflective or representative of our lives? Is it “exploiting” a film, or a piece of art, to read between the lines of its stated intent, and find our own meaning and sense of connection in it?

    Read more

    According to director Enrico Casarosa—who notably also receives a “story by” credit—Luca wasn’t designed to be a gay allegory. During the press rounds leading up to Luca’s release, journalists have asked the filmmaker about its seeming parallels to Luca Guadagnino’s adaptation of the André Aciman novel Call Me By Your Name. (Even the animated film’s title seems like a nod to the gay romance, a reference to its director.) Both films are set in a seaside Italian village, using the woozy summer heat and salty air as a backdrop to a life-changing connection in an adolescent boy’s life. But Casarosa has chalked the similarities up to coincidence, claiming that Luca is inspired by his childhood growing on the northwestern coast of Italy. Luca’s protagonist is significantly younger than Call Me By Your Name’s—he’s more boy than budding young man—and the film’s story reflects that, never addressing romantic feelings at all, and certainly coming nowhere close to the teenaged yearning of Timothée Chalamet’s Elio.

    As Polygon put it in a cheeky but blunt headline: “Sorry, folks, Pixar’s Luca isn’t gay.” During the site’s interview with Casarosa, the director appears to laugh off the assertion: “This was about [Luca and Alberto’s] friendship in that pre-puberty world.” So, sure, what develops between the two young sea monsters isn’t “gay,” but then that doesn’t necessarily mean the movie’s “straight,” either—its story simply exists in a time before those sorts of feelings, romantic or sexual, begin to surface. Casarosa continues, “I was really keen to talk about a friendship before girlfriends and boyfriends come in to complicate things.” It’s an exciting and emotionally complex time in any young person’s life—when kids start to make friends and define who they are, independent of their immediate families—which is why it’s been the crux of many films, animated or otherwise, aimed at family audiences.

    What distinguishes Luca, however, is its central conceit: Luca and Alberto are both fantastical creatures of the ocean, fabled and feared by the land-dwellers in the nearby town of Portorosso, despite their clearly peaceful dispositions. When they leave the beautifully rendered depths of their natural habitat, they take on the appearances of humans, allowing them to exist among the townspeople, who are unaware of the boys’ true identities—as long as they don’t get wet. As the two grow closer, daydream about Vespas, befriend a local girl named Giulia, and train to compete in a triathlon, much of Luca’s tension comes from whether or not they’ll be found out, and if the denizens of Portorosso would be so welcoming to people who don’t look or act like them. Luca and Alberto are just trying to fit in and find some sense of belonging in one another; as Casarosa explained to Polygon, “There’s a loneliness at the heart of [Luca] that is filling a void in all these kids because they feel a little bit odd and lonely.”

    So Casarosa set out to tell a story about feeling different and the rewarding experience of finding others like you, who understand you. That’s a pretty universal theme that most anyone can relate to at some point in their lives, but it rings especially true for anyone who’s ever been perceived as an other. The boys quite literally have to code switch to move freely throughout Portorosso; the story of Luca could be read as a metaphor for not just sexuality but also gender, race, religion, socioeconomic status, or the experience of any marginalized community, really. If you grew up feeling ostracized, or feeling like you had to hide a part of yourself—just as Luca and Alberto have to hide their scales and fins—it’s likely that Luca’s themes will have a deeper resonance for you.

    When Pixar isn’t making us reconsider throwing out old toys, or question a rat’s palate, it’s digging deep into our psyches, anthropomorphizing souls and feelingsone can understand why Luca might be seen as less ambitious by comparison. But, in this writer’s estimation, the more intimate, ground-and-sea-level storytelling is what makes Luca Pixar’s most affecting tale in quite a few years. Though the movie doesn’t spend much time fleshing out Luca’s underwater life, his interior world is immediately clear, especially when human “gadgets and gizmos a-plenty” pique his interest for something more. (Shout out to Ariel.) His family cares for him deeply, but there’s something inside calling out for more, and that something becomes personified when he meets Alberto, a bold and adventurous sea monster whose way of thinking literally expands Luca’s world. The “sea monsters = gay” metaphor doesn’t hold up to scrutiny when you consider that Luca’s own parents, clearly gendered male and female, are also sea monsters. But that subtext is there regardless, and those who grew up closeted or questioning their own sexuality will almost certainly relate to aspects of Luca’s journey.

    There are many moments when Luca’s gay allegory is crystal clear. Early on, when Luca shares interest in “the surface,” his parents panic and, after ushering him off to do his chores, his mother (Maya Rudolph) frets to his more oblivious father (Jim Gaffigan), “We’re a little worried about him right?” They want to protect him and fear that, in expressing his truths, Luca may be threatened by those who don’t understand him. Later, after realizing he’s been sneaking to the surface with a new friend, his parents introduce Luca to Uncle Ugo (Sacha Baron Cohen), who offers to take him to “The Deep,” far away from perceived danger because they “know what’s best for him.” It’s an exceptionally silly moment thanks to Ugo’s cartoonish grotesqueries, but it mirrors darker scenes in other queer narratives, the thought that simply removing someone from a situation can “cure” them of their “abnormal” impulses. Then there’s Alberto—a little bit taller, a little bit older, and confidently moving through the world in a way Luca’s only dreamed of. It’s easy to see why he’d be infatuated, even on a platonic level. As the two stargaze and bond over their love of “human stuff,” Luca has Fellini-esque daydreams, riding a Vespa across a colorful countryside, his arms wrapped around his new friend. Their connection is innocent and simple, but the gleeful giggle he lets out while lying in bed, reflecting on his day of fun with Alberto, feels like the familiar early sign of a developing crush.

    But where Luca’s subtext really becomes text is in a pivotal scene before its final act, when Alberto “outs” himself as a sea monster. The friends have been thriving in Portorosso, but living a lie is starting to weigh on them. Luca is almost caught by his parents (also disguised as humans, worried about their boy), and the slightly older town hot-shot Ercole Visconti is starting to get suspicious. (Whether he’s the latest in a long line of queer-coded Disney villains, or just exceptionally European, is another essay for another time.) Even more distressing is that Luca and Alberto seem to be growing apart—or, at least, they both express hopes for a different future. Alberto wants to stick to their plan, to win a Vespa so they can ride off together and live life openly, away from the threat of being found out. Luca, on the other hand, is growing accustomed to life in disguise and would rather continue living the lie so he can go to school. Their shared secret has brought them close, but now their diverging dreams and fears have them at a crossroads. Out of frustration, Alberto reveals his true identity in front of Giulia, Ercole, and the bully’s lackeys, but, instead of standing by his companion, Luca points the finger at his friend, too: “Sea monster!” It’s a heartbreaking moment, and one that speaks to the hurtful places some young queer kids have gone to hide their own truths. Performed homophobia as a defense mechanism is not uncommon when we’re conditioned to feel shame for who we are, and to see it play out between Luca and Alberto—even as a murky metaphor—is achingly poignant.

    It’s worth mentioning that we’re wading into some tricky waters, that it doesn’t feel particularly appropriate to pontificate on the sexuality of characters who are minors—fictional and animated, yes, but still adolescents. But that’s where we run into the larger issue with Disney’s “exclusively gay moments” thus far, and the way society often talks about sexuality. In most cases, these characters are only queer in so far that they’re seen with, or make mention of, a same-sex partner. There’s so much more to queerness, and any individual’s exploration of their own relationship to queerness, than sex, sexual experimentation, and romance. Luca can operate as a successful queer coming-of-age allegory without its protagonist falling in love with his new friend. To quote my colleague Katie Rife’s piece on Cruella’s glam-rocker character Artie: “Romantic love is but one of the many types of relationships that make up a full life, and a queer person doesn’t need to be partnered for their queerness to be valid.” On that front, Artie actually succeeds where previous LGBTQ+ Disney characters have not: Unlike LeFou, seen momentarily dancing with another man at the end of Beauty And The Beast, or Onward’s Cyclops cop, who refers to her unseen girlfriend back home, his queerness isn’t defined by his relationship to someone else.

    That’s where Luca succeeds, too: The movie doesn’t end with Luca and Alberto as a couple, now comfortable living openly as their sea monster identities in Portorosso—again, these are pre-pubescent boys, a partnered relationship doesn’t even cross their minds, nor should it. Instead, the two head their separate ways, having made a lasting impact on each other’s lives, both more sure of who they are and what they want, all because their connection gave them the space to dream of a future where they’re not so alone. Does that then mean that Luca isn’t gay, as Polygon reports? It shouldn’t have to. Casarosa set out to tell a story about the transformative power of friendship, and, in doing so, Luca teaches the value of surrounding yourself with people who accept you for who you are—a chosen family, if you will. (To continue the metaphor, that makes Giulia a welcome ally.) Queer or not, hopefully young moviegoers can see something of themselves in Luca and feel less alone.

    Which brings us back to Anthony Mackie’s thoughts on “SamBucky” ‘shippers, and his apparent concern that guys can’t just be friends anymore “because something as pure and beautiful as homosexuality has been exploited by people who are trying to rationalize themselves,” whatever that means. If you enjoyed The Falcon And The Winter Soldier and found hints of a spark between Bucky and Sam, or recognized the signs of a burgeoning queer friendship between Luca and Alberto, and viewing those works in such a way gives you a deeper understanding of them, then who can question that? If the subtext you picked up on gives you a greater appreciation of the text, shouldn’t that be welcomed?

    This idea Mackie expresses, that the intent and purpose of something has been “twisted and convoluted,” seems to challenge the idea of what art is supposed to be—that the way a viewer, personally, feels drawn to something can be incorrect because it doesn’t align with the artist’s aims. All of this is not to attack Mackie, who appears to have tripped over his own words; his deeper point seems to be that there’s just as much value in representing “sensitive masculine figure[s]” in pop culture, and that young audiences could stand to see more healthy relationships between cis, straight men. A fair point. (And be fairer still, Mackie is probably tired of fans tweeting SamBucky hentai drawings at him.) But the sting of Mackie’s comments have lingered, largely because they come after a long line of “gay” Disney characters that barely scratch the surface of queerness, and seem to exist just so the company can pat itself on the back. Maybe LGBTQ+ audiences wouldn’t be so thirsty for some Sam Wilson-Bucky Barnes action if we were actually seeing gay superheroes elsewhere in our blockbusters, if there were a diversity of queer characters included in mainstream pop culture that didn’t feel like afterthoughts.

    Despite what Mackie said, regardless of Casarosa’s intent, if you viewed Luca as a queer allegory—and, in doing so, it enriched your understanding of the Pixar film, and maybe even the way you look back on your own coming-of-age story—embrace that. You didn’t view the movie, or the series, or the piece of art wrong; you didn’t twist or convolute anything. What it means to you is what it means to you, and nobody can touch that. So, yeah, those sea monsters are gay.

    kinjavideo-189263

    If Luca and The Falcon And The Winter Soldier are gay to you, then they’re gay – The A.V. Club

    This post discusses the plot of Luca.

    Anthony Mackie, cover your ears: Luca is gay. While it’s not made explicit, Pixar’s latest—the sun-soaked tale about the transformative friendship between two young sea monsters who disguise their true identity to explore life on land among humans—makes for a rich parable for the queer coming-of-age experience, and one that feels more genuine and more heartfelt than any of the Disney corporation’s meager attempts at “exclusively gay moments” in recent years.

    Though the concern Mackie voiced last week, about “the exploitation of homosexuality,” was a direct response to fans ’shipping a romance between his Sam Wilson and Sebastian Stan’s Bucky Barnes in the MCU, it’s hard not to read it as a critique of the broader culture: that LGBTQ+ audiences, in particular, misinterpret certain characters and stories to—in his words—“make themselves relevant and rational.” In that sense, it’s a funny coincidence Mackie’s statement was published the day prior to Luca’s release: Ever since its Call Me By Your Name-esque synopsis was first revealed, it was speculated (sometimes jokingly) that the movie would be gay, or at least a gay metaphor. And, now that it’s available to stream on Disney+, I’m not alone in picking up on a deeper connection within the blossoming friendship of Luca (Jacob Tremblay) and Alberto (Jack Dylan Grazer). So, are we just desperately grasping at straws here, trying to “rationalize” ourselves, by thinking, in some way, that Luca might be reflective or representative of our lives? Is it “exploiting” a film, or a piece of art, to read between the lines of its stated intent, and find our own meaning and sense of connection in it?

    According to director Enrico Casarosa—who notably also receives a “story by” credit—Luca wasn’t designed to be a gay allegory. During the press rounds leading up to Luca’s release, journalists have asked the filmmaker about its seeming parallels to Luca Guadagnino’s adaptation of the André Aciman novel Call Me By Your Name. (Even the animated film’s title seems like a nod to the gay romance, a reference to its director.) Both films are set in a seaside Italian village, using the woozy summer heat and salty air as a backdrop to a life-changing connection in an adolescent boy’s life. But Casarosa has chalked the similarities up to coincidence, claiming that Luca is inspired by his childhood growing on the northwestern coast of Italy. Luca’s protagonist is significantly younger than Call Me By Your Name’s—he’s more boy than budding young man—and the film’s story reflects that, never addressing romantic feelings at all, and certainly coming nowhere close to the teenaged yearning of Timothée Chalamet’s Elio.

    As Polygon put it in a cheeky but blunt headline: “Sorry, folks, Pixar’s Luca isn’t gay.” During the site’s interview with Casarosa, the director appears to laugh off the assertion: “This was about [Luca and Alberto’s] friendship in that pre-puberty world.” So, sure, what develops between the two young sea monsters isn’t “gay,” but then that doesn’t necessarily mean the movie’s “straight,” either—its story simply exists in a time before those sorts of feelings, romantic or sexual, begin to surface. Casarosa continues, “I was really keen to talk about a friendship before girlfriends and boyfriends come in to complicate things.” It’s an exciting and emotionally complex time in any young person’s life—when kids start to make friends and define who they are, independent of their immediate families—which is why it’s been the crux of many films, animated or otherwise, aimed at family audiences.

    What distinguishes Luca, however, is its central conceit: Luca and Alberto are both fantastical creatures of the ocean, fabled and feared by the land-dwellers in the nearby town of Portorosso, despite their clearly peaceful dispositions. When they leave the beautifully rendered depths of their natural habitat, they take on the appearances of humans, allowing them to exist among the townspeople, who are unaware of the boys’ true identities—as long as they don’t get wet. As the two grow closer, daydream about Vespas, befriend a local girl named Giulia, and train to compete in a triathlon, much of Luca’s tension comes from whether or not they’ll be found out, and if the denizens of Portorosso would be so welcoming to people who don’t look or act like them. Luca and Alberto are just trying to fit in and find some sense of belonging in one another; as Casarosa explained to Polygon, “There’s a loneliness at the heart of [Luca] that is filling a void in all these kids because they feel a little bit odd and lonely.”

    So Casarosa set out to tell a story about feeling different and the rewarding experience of finding others like you, who understand you. That’s a pretty universal theme that most anyone can relate to at some point in their lives, but it rings especially true for anyone who’s ever been perceived as an other. The boys quite literally have to code switch to move freely throughout Portorosso; the story of Luca could be read as a metaphor for not just sexuality but also gender, race, religion, socioeconomic status, or the experience of any marginalized community, really. If you grew up feeling ostracized, or feeling like you had to hide a part of yourself—just as Luca and Alberto have to hide their scales and fins—it’s likely that Luca’s themes will have a deeper resonance for you.

    When Pixar isn’t making us reconsider throwing out old toys, or question a rat’s palate, it’s digging deep into our psyches, anthropomorphizing souls and feelingsone can understand why Luca might be seen as less ambitious by comparison. But, in this writer’s estimation, the more intimate, ground-and-sea-level storytelling is what makes Luca Pixar’s most affecting tale in quite a few years. Though the movie doesn’t spend much time fleshing out Luca’s underwater life, his interior world is immediately clear, especially when human “gadgets and gizmos a-plenty” pique his interest for something more. (Shout out to Ariel.) His family cares for him deeply, but there’s something inside calling out for more, and that something becomes personified when he meets Alberto, a bold and adventurous sea monster whose way of thinking literally expands Luca’s world. The “sea monsters = gay” metaphor doesn’t hold up to scrutiny when you consider that Luca’s own parents, clearly gendered male and female, are also sea monsters. But that subtext is there regardless, and those who grew up closeted or questioning their own sexuality will almost certainly relate to aspects of Luca’s journey.

    There are many moments when Luca’s gay allegory is crystal clear. Early on, when Luca shares interest in “the surface,” his parents panic and, after ushering him off to do his chores, his mother (Maya Rudolph) frets to his more oblivious father (Jim Gaffigan), “We’re a little worried about him right?” They want to protect him and fear that, in expressing his truths, Luca may be threatened by those who don’t understand him. Later, after realizing he’s been sneaking to the surface with a new friend, his parents introduce Luca to Uncle Ugo (Sacha Baron Cohen), who offers to take him to “The Deep,” far away from perceived danger because they “know what’s best for him.” It’s an exceptionally silly moment thanks to Ugo’s cartoonish grotesqueries, but it mirrors darker scenes in other queer narratives, the thought that simply removing someone from a situation can “cure” them of their “abnormal” impulses. Then there’s Alberto—a little bit taller, a little bit older, and confidently moving through the world in a way Luca’s only dreamed of. It’s easy to see why he’d be infatuated, even on a platonic level. As the two stargaze and bond over their love of “human stuff,” Luca has Fellini-esque daydreams, riding a Vespa across a colorful countryside, his arms wrapped around his new friend. Their connection is innocent and simple, but the gleeful giggle he lets out while lying in bed, reflecting on his day of fun with Alberto, feels like the familiar early sign of a developing crush.

    But where Luca’s subtext really becomes text is in a pivotal scene before its final act, when Alberto “outs” himself as a sea monster. The friends have been thriving in Portorosso, but living a lie is starting to weigh on them. Luca is almost caught by his parents (also disguised as humans, worried about their boy), and the slightly older town hot-shot Ercole Visconti is starting to get suspicious. (Whether he’s the latest in a long line of queer-coded Disney villains, or just exceptionally European, is another essay for another time.) Even more distressing is that Luca and Alberto seem to be growing apart—or, at least, they both express hopes for a different future. Alberto wants to stick to their plan, to win a Vespa so they can ride off together and live life openly, away from the threat of being found out. Luca, on the other hand, is growing accustomed to life in disguise and would rather continue living the lie so he can go to school. Their shared secret has brought them close, but now their diverging dreams and fears have them at a crossroads. Out of frustration, Alberto reveals his true identity in front of Giulia, Ercole, and the bully’s lackeys, but, instead of standing by his companion, Luca points the finger at his friend, too: “Sea monster!” It’s a heartbreaking moment, and one that speaks to the hurtful places some young queer kids have gone to hide their own truths. Performed homophobia as a defense mechanism is not uncommon when we’re conditioned to feel shame for who we are, and to see it play out between Luca and Alberto—even as a murky metaphor—is achingly poignant.

    It’s worth mentioning that we’re wading into some tricky waters, that it doesn’t feel particularly appropriate to pontificate on the sexuality of characters who are minors—fictional and animated, yes, but still adolescents. But that’s where we run into the larger issue with Disney’s “exclusively gay moments” thus far, and the way society often talks about sexuality. In most cases, these characters are only queer in so far that they’re seen with, or make mention of, a same-sex partner. There’s so much more to queerness, and any individual’s exploration of their own relationship to queerness, than sex, sexual experimentation, and romance. Luca can operate as a successful queer coming-of-age allegory without its protagonist falling in love with his new friend. To quote my colleague Katie Rife’s piece on Cruella’s glam-rocker character Artie: “Romantic love is but one of the many types of relationships that make up a full life, and a queer person doesn’t need to be partnered for their queerness to be valid.” On that front, Artie actually succeeds where previous LGBTQ+ Disney characters have not: Unlike LeFou, seen momentarily dancing with another man at the end of Beauty And The Beast, or Onward’s Cyclops cop, who refers to her unseen girlfriend back home, his queerness isn’t defined by his relationship to someone else.

    That’s where Luca succeeds, too: The movie doesn’t end with Luca and Alberto as a couple, now comfortable living openly as their sea monster identities in Portorosso—again, these are pre-pubescent boys, a partnered relationship doesn’t even cross their minds, nor should it. Instead, the two head their separate ways, having made a lasting impact on each other’s lives, both more sure of who they are and what they want, all because their connection gave them the space to dream of a future where they’re not so alone. Does that then mean that Luca isn’t gay, as Polygon reports? It shouldn’t have to. Casarosa set out to tell a story about the transformative power of friendship, and, in doing so, Luca teaches the value of surrounding yourself with people who accept you for who you are—a chosen family, if you will. (To continue the metaphor, that makes Giulia a welcome ally.) Queer or not, hopefully young moviegoers can see something of themselves in Luca and feel less alone.

    Which brings us back to Anthony Mackie’s thoughts on “SamBucky” ‘shippers, and his apparent concern that guys can’t just be friends anymore “because something as pure and beautiful as homosexuality has been exploited by people who are trying to rationalize themselves,” whatever that means. If you enjoyed The Falcon And The Winter Soldier and found hints of a spark between Bucky and Sam, or recognized the signs of a burgeoning queer friendship between Luca and Alberto, and viewing those works in such a way gives you a deeper understanding of them, then who can question that? If the subtext you picked up on gives you a greater appreciation of the text, shouldn’t that be welcomed?

    This idea Mackie expresses, that the intent and purpose of something has been “twisted and convoluted,” seems to challenge the idea of what art is supposed to be—that the way a viewer, personally, feels drawn to something can be incorrect because it doesn’t align with the artist’s aims. All of this is not to attack Mackie, who appears to have tripped over his own words; his deeper point seems to be that there’s just as much value in representing “sensitive masculine figure[s]” in pop culture, and that young audiences could stand to see more healthy relationships between cis, straight men. A fair point. (And be fairer still, Mackie is probably tired of fans tweeting SamBucky hentai drawings at him.) But the sting of Mackie’s comments have lingered, largely because they come after a long line of “gay” Disney characters that barely scratch the surface of queerness, and seem to exist just so the company can pat itself on the back. Maybe LGBTQ+ audiences wouldn’t be so thirsty for some Sam Wilson-Bucky Barnes action if we were actually seeing gay superheroes elsewhere in our blockbusters, if there were a diversity of queer characters included in mainstream pop culture that didn’t feel like afterthoughts.

    Despite what Mackie said, regardless of Casarosa’s intent, if you viewed Luca as a queer allegory—and, in doing so, it enriched your understanding of the Pixar film, and maybe even the way you look back on your own coming-of-age story—embrace that. You didn’t view the movie, or the series, or the piece of art wrong; you didn’t twist or convolute anything. What it means to you is what it means to you, and nobody can touch that. So, yeah, those sea monsters are gay.

    Hungary’s cruel ‘LGBT+ propaganda’ ban is an ‘affront to human rights’, say top UK officials – Yahoo Eurosport UK

    Top British officials have slammed Hungary’s “LGBT+ propaganda” ban as an “affront to human rights” as it faces fire from both sides of the political spectrum.

    Earlier this month, ruling Fidesz party lawmakers in Hungary added last-minute changes to an anti-paedophilia bill that bans any discussion of LGBT+ people in schools and in the media.

    It passed in a lopsided 157-1 vote last week that touched off nationwide protests as rainbow flags flooded the streets of Budapest outside Hungary’s parliament, the National Assembly.

    But as Brussels prepares to counter the bill, British officials are also sharpening their attack lines. Top lawmakers from both the ruling Conservative Party and opposition Labour have emphatically denounced the legislation, one they say deeply cuts into queer Hungarians’ already threadbare rights.

    Wendy Morton, a Foreign Office minister in charge of European affairs, voiced the government’s “concerns” over the bill that passed just weeks after prime minister Boris Johnson warmly welcomed his Hungarian counterpart, Viktor Orbán, to Number 10.

    “We are concerned by measures that discriminate against the LGBT+ community in the law passed by the Hungarian parliament last week,” she tweeted Monday (21 June).

    “The UK stands up for the rights of [LGBT+] people all over the world, and we stand in solidarity with LGBT+ people in Hungary.”

    In publicly upbraiding the bill, however, Hungarian ministers quickly veered into attack mode. Zoltan Kovács, an Orbán administration veteran and government mouthpiece, called on Morton to “read the text of the new law”.

    “In [Hungary], we believe that educating children about sexual orientation must be protected as the sole right of parents,” he tweeted. “And no, we’re not going to apologise for protecting our children.”

    Morton’s Labour equivalent, Catherine West, who serves as shadow minister for Europe and the Americas, told PinkNews that the government must lock arms and stand up for queer Hungarians.

    “This is a further sign of the alarming slide in LGBT+ rights we are witnessing in Hungary and other parts of Europe and demonstrates how inappropriate it was for Boris Johnson to roll out the red carpet for Hungarian prime minister Victor Orbán a few weeks ago,” she said in a statement.

    “Britain should act to protect LGBT+ rights the world over, and the UK government must make it clear these developments are completely unacceptable.

    “LGBT+ rights are human rights, and must be at the heart of the government’s ‘Global Britain’ strategy.”

    Nick Herbert, the Conservative Party’s first openly gay lawmaker and LGBT+ envoy, added to the drumbeat of criticism in an interview with Openly. “This kind of law is obviously completely unacceptable,” he said.

    “It’s an affront to human rights [and] it’s very concerning that European countries should be going backwards like this.”

    He added that Johnson raised the alarm over the country’s treatment of queer rights to Orbán when the premier visited.

    Participants gather near the parliament building in Budapest on June 14, 2021, during a demonstration against the Hungarian government’s draft bill seeking to ban the ‘promotion’ of homosexuality. (GERGELY BESENYEI/AFP via Getty Images)

    Participants gather near the parliament building in Budapest on June 14, 2021, during a demonstration against the Hungarian government’s draft bill seeking to ban the ‘promotion’ of homosexuality. (GERGELY BESENYEI/AFP via Getty Images)

    As British officials join the European Union in offering bruising takedowns of Orbán, it remains unclear whether either side will be issuing sanctions anytime soon.

    The EU’s equalities commissioner has already vowed to continue the bloc’s playbook on dealing with homophobia in member states by withholding funding for certain projects.

    But such words, promises and even symbolic gestures offer little solace for queer Hungarians, who have been forced to hunker down or even flee the country to escape the relentless attacks from elected officials.

    Obrán, with an election looming, has sought to present himself as something of a protector of traditional Christian values. By trying to score cheap party points by tangling up being LGBT+ with paedophilia, Orbán promotes the government as something of a bulwark against liberal values.

    His government has aggressively whittled away at LGBT+ rights over his premiership, from outlawing civil unions and same-sex adoption to even launching a bid to legally erase trans people.

    But embattled activists remain hopeful. Scenes of tens of thousands queer Hungarians and allies taking to the street and Budapest Pride charging ahead with its march next month remind advocacy groups why the fight has not yet been lost.

    “We won’t be silenced, we won’t be banned,” said Budapest Pride organiser Viktória Radványi in a statement posted on Hungary’s oldest LGBT+ rights group, the Háttér Society.

    “Reality cannot be banned.”

    Luca fans are convinced it’s a gay love story and the memes are iconic – PopBuzz

    21 June 2021, 17:28 | Updated: 21 June 2021, 17:46

    Luca’s director says that the movie is about friendship but viewers are claiming it as Pixar’s first LGBTQ+ movie.

    Luca is finally out on Disney+ and viewers are praising the Pixar movie for its queer coding: the two leads appear to be gay.

    Luca tells the story of Luca, a teenage sea monster who can assume human form and dreams of exploring life outside of the water. In the film, he meets Alberto, another teenage sea monster who shows him what the world is like on land. The two of them quickly grow close and make plans to get a Vespa and travel the world. They regularly hold hands and look at each other longingly. They also face prejudice from humans for being different and have to hide who they are from them.

    At the end of the film, Luca’s mother is worried about whether or not humans will accept Luca and his grandmother says: “Some people, they’ll never accept him but some will and he seems to know how to find the good ones.”

    LGBTQ+ viewers worldwide have connected to the movie and the memes and reactions are both wholesome and hilarious.

    Is Luca gay? Here’s what the director has said.

    Is Luca gay? The best memes and reactions to the Pixar movie
    Is Luca gay? The best memes and reactions to the Pixar movie. Picture: Disney+

    Discussing whether or not Luca is a gay love story, director Enrico Casarosa told Polygon: “I was really keen to talk about a friendship before girlfriends and boyfriends come in to complicate things.” He then added: “This was about their friendship in that pre-puberty world. The type of friendship that is gonna push you into trouble, push you into change, push you into finding yourself.”

    In spite of what Enrico has said many believe that the queer themes are too apparent to ignore. One person tweeted: “Just saw Luca, & I don’t care what anyone else says, it’s the first gay animated film by Disney/Pixar. Feeling like you have to hide a part of yourself, meeting someone like you 4 the first time, strangers calling you and your ‘friend’ monsters, finding the good ones. I cried.”

    Another person tweeted: “Just watched Luca and now I’m crying over gay fish what the fuck.”

    It’s also worth noting that even though Casarosa said that Luca is not a gay love story, he hasn’t explicitly said if Luca and Alberto are queer or not. In other words, it’s possible that it’s still an LGBTQ+ story regardless of romance.

    What do you think? Is Luca queer-coded?

    Out In Verona – My veronanj


    On June 28, 1969, New York City police raided the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in Greenwich Village. Stonewall’s patrons fought back, a landmark event in the fight for gay rights. While recognition and acceptance of LGBTQ people in the U.S. has greatly accelerated since then, much work remains to be done to ensure that they have the protection and support of their communities — and Verona is no exception.

    “You know, Verona isn’t seen as particularly progressive,” says A., a junior at Verona High School who wishes to remain anonymous to protect their identity. “We’re between Cedar Grove and the Caldwells, which are more conservative, and Montclair, which is very progressive. I think Verona’s caught in between those two cultures, and that can make it difficult to be queer here.”

    Verona has taken steps to show support for its LGBTQ community, including raising a Pride flag in town center. However, Verona’s young queer people say that raising a flag isn’t enough. They report a culture toward LGBTQ people that, while not outwardly hostile, is internally judgemental and stigmatizing towards those who aren’t heterosexual or don’t identify with the gender they were assigned at birth (those who do identify with their assigned gender at birth are referred to as “cisgender”), and feel that Verona has a ways to go in accepting and supporting its queer community.

    “I feel fairly safe walking around here,” says Griffin Willner, a senior at VHS. “But that doesn’t mean I feel supported.”

    “I feel fairly safe walking around here,” says Griffin Willner, a senior at VHS. “But that doesn’t mean I feel supported.” Willner isn’t alone in his assessment of Verona’s attitude toward queer youth. Across town, Verona’s LGBTQ students draw a distinction between avoiding explicit harassment and violence and feeling that their community has their back — and sometimes, harassment can be more than covert whispers and hostile glances. “One time, on a date night with my boyfriend, we were walking holding hands, and a car of guys drove by us and screamed ‘Faggots!’ out the window,” reports Willner. “So, yeah, that can make my partner and I nervous to show we’re a couple in public.”

    In this sense, Verona isn’t alone: Across the country, LGBTQ youth are more likely to face harassment and violence compared to their peers who are heterosexual and cisgender. However, for Verona’s LGBTQ students, harassment can come as a wake-up call in a town that has attempted to appear more progressive. “Performative acts like hanging up equality banners in the high school or the Pride flag in the town center won’t make most of us [LGBTQ people] feel any differently about the town unless the people in it change,” says Maria Serra, a senior at VHS. It’s not that students are hostile toward raising a Pride flag or putting “Safe Space” stickers on the doors of classrooms at VHS. Rather, it’s that Verona’s people need a broader shift in their attitudes toward queer youth, and without this change, queer students will remain fearful of harassment and judgement from young people and adults alike.

    “We’re a small town,” says A. “There’s definitely a town gossip culture, and that means things can easily reach the wrong ears.” Students describe a two-fold pressure in Verona: it can be difficult to be accepted as LGBTQ unless one explicitly comes out, but once one does, a person’s identity can quickly circulate around town. “If someone doesn’t have a supportive family, coming out can be horrible for them,” A. continues. “So that’s why it can be difficult to be openly queer here.”

    “No one takes you seriously unless you come out,” senior Breianna Magardino concurs. “I’m lucky, I have a supportive family. But I still feel pressure to prove that I’m actually queer here, and that’s not easy.”

    “I’m lucky, I have a supportive family,” says Breianna Magardino. “But I still feel pressure to prove that I’m actually queer here, and that’s not easy.”

    It’s not merely the pressure to come out that can make growing up LGBTQ in Verona difficult, though. “I really don’t identify with the white queer culture here,” says C., a non-white student who wishes to remain anonymous to protect their identity. “You have to come out to be accepted as LGBT, and since I don’t relate to the white queer culture here, and I don’t want to date anyone, I don’t feel any desire to come out.”

    Others share that assessment. “I feel that I’m not really enough of anything,” says Magardino, who is biracial, bisexual, and exploring her own connection to womanhood. “At the same time, I feel my own differences compared to the kids around me, but also that I don’t fit into the POC or LGBTQ community here.”

    Indeed, it’s Verona’s demographics that prove most challenging for many LGBTQ students, who already form a minority of the population. “It’s so homogenous here,” says A. “The same families live here and stay here for generations, and the same prejudices remain.” While Verona has been getting more diverse, the new population moving in isn’t nearly large enough to drastically change town culture. “Until the people change, things can’t get better, and I don’t know how easily that can happen.”

    Verona’s queer students believe there are several ways that Verona could help support its LGBTQ community, starting with disciplining homophobic bullying. “I was called a homophobic slur in middle school by a classmate,” says Serra, “and his ‘punishment’ when I reported him was to apologize.” Only a minority of teachers nationwide have experienced any sort of professional development regarding LGBTQ harassment and bullying, and students often report difficulties in seeing their issues properly addressed.

    Students also want schools to be more inclusive of LGBTQ students in the curriculum, especially regarding sex education. “Sex education here is very focused on straight people,” says Willner, echoing a national trend regarding a lack of LGBTQ inclusive sex-education. “LGBTQ people have unique needs when it comes to sexual health, even if it doesn’t involve pregnancy — not only straight people can get STDs!”

    Despite these challenges, though, Verona’s queer students are thankful for those who have proved strong allies toward the LGBTQ community. “Teachers like [Melissa] Wallerstein, they’re so important in making us feel accepted,” says Willner. Indeed, having a supportive adult can be instrumental for LGBTQ students’ mental and physical health, and members of Verona’s faculty have proven more than willing to help their queer students.

    Students also described the importance of LGBTQ friendly spaces in the school, such as the Spotlight Players Drama Club. “Support for the arts, that’s so important for LGBTQ students, since so many queer people end up in drama or music or the like,” says A. “If we valued the arts as much as sports here, that would be really impactful for queer kids here.”

    Ultimately, Verona’s LGBTQ students want something little different from any of their peers: community, friendship, and the ability to freely express who they are. “It’s about finding your people,” says Willner, “and having people around you that support and affirm you.”

    Certainly, Verona’s community and people can’t change overnight. But, students still expressed hope for the future of their town. “I really think a lot of the homophobia here comes from ignorance,” says A. “I don’t want to set my expectations too high. But I have hope that things can change.”

    To support its LGBTQ community, Verona schools could better discipline homophobic bullying, students say. “I was called a homophobic slur in middle school by a classmate,” says Maria Serra, “and his ‘punishment’ when I reported him was to apologize.”

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    A gay couple was ordered to take down their Pride flag & now their neighbors are flying them too – LGBTQ Nation

    A Florida couple won’t back down after their homeowners association threatened to fine them for hanging a small Pride flag outside their home for Pride month.

    Mike Ferrari and Bob Plominski were shocked to receive a notice from the Eastland Cove HOA in Broward County saying they will be fined $50 a day if they do not remove their flag.

    Related: Viral video shows Oklahoma man defiantly flying Pride flag in conservative small town

    For ten years, the couple has flown a variety of flags–including the Pride flag–outside their home. While technically, the HOA rules say residents can only fly the American or military flags, the couple has never received a violation notice for flying other flags, such as one in support of the March for Our Lives.

    “I really think the citation is because it’s a gay pride flag and someone in the neighborhood is offended, simple as that,” Ferrari told NBC.

    “I got upset. We’ve done this before and it’s a simple showing of our pride to the community and it’s up for 30 days,” Plominski added. “We were in shock they were going to do that.”

    HOA president Bob Brosseau told the New York Times he supports the couple flying the flag, but it was out of his hands after a resident complained. Legally, he explained, the HOA has to act once a complaint is filed or risk being sued.

    “As a board member, I was very upset that it was even brought up,” he said. Brosseau and one other board member voted against issuing the violation notice in a 3-2 vote.

    In July, the couple can appeal the violation before a committee, which will determine whether they will have to pay their fines for refusing to comply with the order to take down the flag.

    In the meantime, the situation has only fueled Plominski and Ferrari’s desire to display their pride even louder. Not only have they hung more Pride flags outside their home, but they have also gone door to door passing them out to neighbors who want to stand in solidarity with them.

    According to the New York Times, eleven of their neighbors are now flying Pride flags outside their homes.

    “My husband and I decided we weren’t going to stand by and take down our flag because somebody, I feel, was offended by the flag in our community,” Ferrari said. “Ten dollars, $50, $100 a day — it’s staying up.”

    “It’s going to stay up until June 30th,” Plominski said to NBC. “We as a community worked really hard to earn and get to where we are today. We’re not going to back down on this one.”